The Edo State Governor,
Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, has alleged that the current political crisis in his state was part of the plan by the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), to destabilise the state ahead of the 2015 general election.
Oshiomhole stated this, last Tuesday, while fielding questions from State House correspondents at the Presidential Villa, after attending the National Council of State meeting.
The governor, who boasted that he had defeated the PDP in all the elections conducted in the state and all the 18 local government areas including the local government of a PDP leader, Tony Anenih, since 2009, vowed that he would not be intimidated or made to succumb to the destabilising antics of the party.
Governor Oshiomhole, while tracing the history of the crisis, blamed it on the four members of the state’s House of Assembly who defected to PDP.
“The issue in Edo is straightforward; four members of the PDP on their own went to court asking the Federal High Court to ask the Speaker not to declare their seats vacant. Number two, asking the Court to restrain the Speaker and the House of Assembly from carrying out any disciplinary action against them. The court granted these two reliefs. Now the issue is, I can understand why they were asking that their seats should not be declared vacant because they had changed camp, the penalty as provided by Section 109 of the Constitution. But they also went on to ask the court to restrain the Speaker from suspending them based on internal disciplinary issues,” Oshiomhole disclosed.
He explained that the court granted both prayers.
“When the motion was argued by both sides, the court ordered that the Speaker should still not declare their seats vacant pending the determination of the substantive suit.
However, the court vacated the order restraining the House and the speaker from suspending them for any alleged misconduct on the ground that the court cannot prevent an arm of government from carrying out internal disciplinary measures. Now having vacated one leg of the other, the House met subsequently based on their rules and suspended these four members,” he explained.
Oshiomhole pointed out that in a democracy, there was only one civilised to contest an unfair action – by going to court – and lambasted the lawmakers for refusing to abide by the suspension order in clear violation of the rules of the House of Assembly.
He explained that the House, determined to be on the right side of the law, decided that rather than physically resolve the matter decided to approach the High Court to ask it to grant interim injunction restraining the four suspended members from coming into the House of Assembly.
He noted that “because the police was aiding and abetting these suspended members, the House also asked the court to restrain the police from aiding and abetting these people from violating the suspension order.”
